The following is a copy of my follow up correspondence with ADRE Commissioner Lowe regarding ADRE’s failure to protect the interests of the general public by 1) not removing CAI and AACM from its lists of resources and 2) misinforming the public that OAH will address corporate law disputes. The two referenced messages can be found at AZ Case Reviews.
August 16, 2017
Commissioner Lowe, ADRE
Re Message Id: 230332, incorrect listing of corporation law
Dear Commissioner Lowe,
I have not received a response to my correspondence of July 28th regarding the misleading mention on ADRE’s web page that Arizona corporation law applies to OAH dispute process. Your quick reply of the 28th simply provided the canned we are looking into it response.
I do not understand this 19-day failure to correct a black and white incorrect implication that OAH has authority to hear corporation law HOA disputes. I even provided the exact statute for your convenience. What “adjusting” does it take beyond the removal of a one-line entry on the web page?
When can the general public see this error on the part of ADRE corrected?
While I have your attention, when can the general public see the removal of the two private organizations who opposed OAH due process and the application of constitutional protections for homeowners members? I provided details as to why CAI and AACM should be removed from your recommendations as resources. I also asked, in my correspondence of August 8th, why other private entity websites by homeowner rights advocates – that provided documented and authoritative information – were not included in ADRE’s list of resources. I suggested that they be added in all fairness and in keeping with ADRE’s mission to protect the general interest.
When can the general public see an unbiased list of resources for HOA home buyers on ADRE’s website?
Respectfully,
George K. Staropoli, Citizens for Constitutional Local Government
HOA Constitutional Government 
I met Louis Dettorre Deputy Commissioner a year+ ago and I told him this exact same thing. I’ve written to them and told them that neither CAI or AACM are any help. As a matter of fact they are a hindrance to building a relationship between the HO, board and MC. Will anyone protect the HO????? They were gracious enough to rearrange the website but I firmly believe these two institutions should be removed from their site. It’s a totally adversarial relationship; what’s worse is that the public needs to understand that the boards on both these institutions are all MC’s … who’s interests are they protecting? Certainly not mine. Thank you George for bringing this out again.
Good to hear, Wendy.
I expect this exchange to continue for a while, even in the event of no response from ADRE which I believe is its most likely reaction. I have a host of details yet on this subject, including responses from ADRE dating back to 2011.
Any pertinent material and documentation in ADRE’s own words would be very helpful. Homeowners should write ADRE using its contact form, mentioning and adding to my correspondence would also be very helpful. Go to http://azre.gov and click on ‘contact us.’