The AZ Senate passed HB 2158, the fair elections in HOAs bill sending it on to the Governor for signing. I congratulate all advocates who supported this bill and the Arizona Legislators coming to understand the need to stop board of director’s abuse under authoritarian private agreements.
This is a major step forward to the equal protection of the laws and proper due process as guaranteed to all US citizens. Under this bill, effective and meaningful opportunity for Arizona members to participate fairly and in an equal manner in the governance of an HOA.
It starts with the ability to campaign and discuss governing issues with the members on the same level playing field. All the members seeking change have to do is to get involved knowing they won’t be “fighting city hall” without legislative support.
The positive effect of this bill includes the need for a rewrite of the governing documents in many areas for many HOAs, removing covenants not complying with the new state law in.
Last month I urged all HOA members to support Arizona’s HB 2158,
“Many courts have referred to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as the HOA constitution. Arizona’s HB 2158 is a second try (Arizona HB 2052 restores homeowner constitutional speech protections ) to prohibit restrictions on HOA members’ freedom of political speech with respect to HOA governance issues and matters.”
The bill addresses the right of members to free political speech on matters affecting the governance of the HOA by specifying such rights and prohibiting HOA interference with these rights. While the bill refers to “association-specific” signs, it is a giant step toward HOA democracy by creating a fair election and voting process, affecting procedures now dominated by the pro-HOA governing documents.
You can read the itemized “freedoms” here. Just a few,
Defines an association-specific political sign as a sign that supports or opposes a candidate for the board or the recall of a board member or a condominium or planned community ballot measure that requires a vote of the COA or HOA owners.
Prohibits a COA or HOA from prohibiting or unreasonably restricting an owner’s ability to peacefully assemble and use common areas of the COA or HOA,
[prohibits] making any other regulations regarding the content of an association-specific political sign,
Allows an owner to invite one political candidate or guest to speak to an assembly of owners about matters related to the respective condominium or planned community.
The bill passed the House and will be heard all over again, as required by law, in the Senate this Monday, March 14th. The Senate has always been a “stopper” of HOA reform bils; your continued, loud and clear support is necessary.
Email the Senate Government committee members NOW!
Sonny Borrelli
Vice-Chairman
Sally Ann Gonzales
Member
Theresa Hatathlie
Member
J.D. Mesnard
Member
Martin Quezada
Member
Wendy Rogers
Member
Kelly Townsend
Chairman
If familiar with the Legislature’s RTS procedure, sign on and make your voice via RTS, which is read by the committee members and made part of the record. Instructions on how to set up your RTS account can be found here. It may look complicated but it simple, just fill in the boxes. Your RTS can be used for any bill by just entering the bill number.
Unfortunately, you must set up your account at a kiosk at the state capitol, after which youc can access your account from your home.
An excerpt from the HOA “bible” that was the source of the HOA legal scheme and structure, and included appendices on model CC&Rs and bylaws (Appendices F, G, and H, pages 384 – 402). While over time minor changes have appeared in governing documents, they are for the most part, and in particular on fundamental issues, boilerplate covenants contained in the Handbook.
Note that no mention is made of the homeowner, the HOA member, whose property interests are at stake and the subject of the legal scheme. “Association officers,” as we have discovered, represent the association and not the personal property interests of the members. The members are there, it seems, to fund the HOA. It is a top-down governmental structure with little concern for protecting principles of democratic government.
Some 23% of Americans live in HOA-Land, that collection of fragmented independent principalities known, in general, as HOAs. HOAs are separate, local private governments not subject to the constitution, and collectively constitute a nation within a defined geographical region known as the United States.
“A nation consists of a distinct population of people that are bound together by a common culture, history, and tradition who are typically concentrated within a specific geographic region.”
Jonathan Chait (Nymag.com, Jan. 3, 2022), wrote last week, “You can’t stop authoritarianism unless you understand it.” Consequently, my continued effort to reorient and reeducate HOA BODS and its followers.
“A totalitarian democracy . . . retains full power of . . . the right of control over everything and everyone. Maintenance of such power, in the absence of full support of the citizenry, requires the forceful suppression of any dissenting element except what the government purposely permits or organizes.”
The authoritarianism of HOA-Land is masked by a thorough indoctrination that the real estate subdivision is a democratic community because the members are allowed to vote, as meaningless as it is. It seems that the more predisposed to authoritarian control the more the member acts as a diehard, dogmatic, true-believer in the BOD.
A quick and simple — but highly effective — bill that was proposed in March 2011 and will bring relief to homeowners being treated a second-class citizens by state laws in support of the HOA legal scheme. It was ignored by Arizona advocates and dismissed by the Legislature.
“No provision of any contract or any declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions . . . is enforceable in this state unless the party seeking to enforce the provision proves by clear and convincing evidence that 1) the provision being enforced was knowingly and voluntarily agreed to by all parties . . . . Any representation or statement offered as clear and convincing evidence . . . shall include a signed statement containing the following, beginning with “I understand that I can ask that the following be read and explained to my satisfaction.”
“So reads an excerpt from my proposed “Truth in HOAs” statute that should be made law in each and every state. That is, if indeed the legislature stands by the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, which we are hearing so much about in the media nowadays.”
The “The Truth in HOAs Act,” as I called it, allows each state to modify the proposal in accordance with its state HOA/condo acts — shown in square brackets []. Also, subsection (3) contains a list of acknowledgements that can be tailored to each state’s advocate lobbying efforts. See Arizona Truth in HOAs statute (pvtgov.org). The essential bill section is contained in subparagraph (4).
“Therefore, in reference to subsection 3(d) above, the CC&Rs or Declaration for any planned community, condominium association or homeowners association shall state that, “The association hereby waivers and surrenders any rights or claims it may have, and herewith unconditionally and irrevocably agrees to be bound by the US and State Constitutions and laws of the State as if it were a local public government entity.”
This 2022 legislative session offers a unique, one-time opportunity to get the message across and to educate the legislators. Remaining silent on the issues only plays into the pro-HOA hands of CAI and offers excuses by the media not to cover HOA abuse. Not only will you find “ammunition” in support of your arguments as contained in the 2 above publications, but also in my Arizona Supreme Court amicus brief filed and accepted in Tarter v. Bendt (see note (vi) in Can HOA members expect justice in Arizona courts?).
My arguments are summarized in the Commentary. As is my approach, my arguments are supported by legal authority and hard evidence documents, which CAI ignores and YOU lose! They must be exposed if the legislators are to be fully informed on the reality of HOA-Land. As leaders who are internet publishers, actions speak louder than words!