Will forcing HOAs to be financially responsible stiffle "a good thing"?

Now, as I was saying about the requirements for the mass merchandising of homeowners associations, and the covenants and laws necessary for this to take place.  The individual property rights of the homeowners were secondary, and denied as necessary for the HOA’s survivlal.  See The Foundations of Homeowners Associations and the New America and short author interview video on New America.
 
Now, homeowner protections are being put into place not to restore American democracy, but to protect the lenders.  With sensible regulation rather than laissez-faire “anything goes” to sell, sell, sell, will HOAs be such a “good thing” anymore?
 
New Fannie Mae Condo Regulations Could Stifle Condo Demand
 
Here is a brief overview of the Fannie Mae condo guideline changes:
 
*  For new construction and newly converted condo developments, 70% of the units must be pre-sold (closed or under contract). This is being increased from 51%.
*  No more than 10% of a project can be owned by a single entity.
*  The homeowners association must have at least 10% of its budgeted income designated for replacement reserves and adequate funds budgeted for the insurance deductible. *  No more than 15% of a condo project units can be more than 30 days delinquent on condo fees

Published by

Unknown's avatar

HOAGOV

"The Voice for HOA Constitutionality". I have been a long-term homeowner rights authority, advocate and author of "The HOA-Land Nation Within America" (2019) and" Establishing the New America of independent HOA principalities" (2008). See HOA Constitutional Government at http://pvtgov.org. My efforts with HOAs took me to a broader concern that was deeply affecting the constituionality of HOAs. Those broad societal and plotical concerns caused me to start this new blog for my commentaries on the State of the New America.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.