Best interests of the ‘state’ or of the people?

The fact that HOA boards are corporate entities and not public bodies raises the question of “loyalty” or duties.  Do your representatives act in the best interest of their constituents, the people, or in the best interests of the state?  We know that, as a corporate entity, boards are required to act in the best interest of the HOA, the state, and not in the best interests of the people, the homeowners.Is there any real difference between the “state” and the “people”?  Is there any difference between the HOA and the homowners?  CAI and the courts argue yes, there is a difference.

Should HOA boards be required to true elected representatives of the the homeowners as our public officials?  

Published by

Unknown's avatar

HOAGOV

"The Voice for HOA Constitutionality". I have been a long-term homeowner rights authority, advocate and author of "The HOA-Land Nation Within America" (2019) and" Establishing the New America of independent HOA principalities" (2008). See HOA Constitutional Government at http://pvtgov.org. My efforts with HOAs took me to a broader concern that was deeply affecting the constituionality of HOAs. Those broad societal and plotical concerns caused me to start this new blog for my commentaries on the State of the New America.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.